Richie Amarawadee is playing first lakorn

krisayaporn

sarNie Adult
"Richie Amarawadee" main actress in Koo Kum 2013, she is playing first lakorn of Uma in Ch3.
 
If I guess that is "Suay Rai Sai Lap", because This lakorn is new lakorn of Uma.
 
Cr. Pantip
 
 

hsdsfan

sarNie Hatchling
Yeah that's likely the lakorn that Richie is going to be in. Seems like all of A Supachai's new kids are starting off either as supporting or evening lakorns which is good since they're still so inexperienced. Gap will also be in a new lakorn with Aun Wittaya. 
 
This girl has a nice and adorable personality but no matter what, I still don't think she has what it takes to be a nang'ek. She's just...not nang'ek material. It's good that she's starting off this way because she needs to build a lot of experience but it's about looks too...at least to me. She doesn't have a nang'ek look.
 

fun

Expired Sarnie
I don't know if she is lucky or unlucky to have first debuted through a movie that was just bad, from cinematography to script. Although I didn't like her acting in Sunset at the Chao Praya River, let's see if all those negative critique helped her in improving her acting. 
 

bubbles8

sarNie Adult
Im glad richie is given a second chance, i do sympathise for her. hopefully there are more workshops for her to attend so she could improve on her acting and make her less nervous to ET, and wishing she could pair up with a cute and experienced guy/crews
 

SonYukView4ever

♥OFFICIAL MARK PRIN STALKER♥
They should have started her out with supporting roles then slowly climb up the ladder. Giving a major role to a newbie who has no background in acting is definitely troubling. is she nang'ek in this new role?? that would be tough bc nang'ek must carry acting/emotions and has a higher responsibility. if she's not capable of doing that yet, they should go easy on her. plus, to be honest richie does not have the look and therefore doesnt make her nang'ek material.  I really think she should just start with smaller roles first otherwise if she screw up another big role, people will just bash her.
 
take Diana for example, her role in Samee Teetra is a good supporting role that helps her shine.  Since playing a good supporting character in ST actually helps get rid of the tension on her shoulders and she plays those scenes that supplement the show, which gives her time to shine. and being a side character actually makes the audience wants to see her more when she delivers her parts well. But if she were to carry on a full nang'ek role, it may be too much on her.  But she is definitely more eye candy and catchy on the screen so people may easily forgive her. lol
 
Nang'ek in general needs to look pretty and attractive, but if they lack good looks and have terrible acting, oh man it's hard sitting through that show. lol
 
But in all honesty,  I dont think Richie should be nang'ek. she could play supporting, but not nang'ek material at all.
 

Cupid Candy

sarNie Coma
eh, I'm not really feeling Richy as an actress. Put her in some supporting roles and if her acting improves then we'll see but she doesn't fit my image of n'ek.
 

fun

Expired Sarnie
1. Talent
2. Looks
3. Attraction
 
If you don't have one or more of the qualification above, you are screwed. What I mean about attraction is, they got to at least be bearable to watch. For example, Smart! I swear he cannot act even if his life is on the line. He definitely does not have look but he has attraction- his dimples and some of the roles he does. I can at least sit through a lakorn of his despite his poor acting. Pretty much Richie started out with none of the above. Even after Sunset at the Chao Praya, she doesn't fit to any of the category above but I'm always up for improvement. I usually have my 3 strike given to an actor or actress. After that, it will be coincident that I will happen to watch because one of my bias is in it. 
 
Top