dont know why there are serious kim fans out there when her cheating on Jet with mark is so obvious if you date back the mk relationship timeline. i just cant stand watching her play some loyal/steadfast/innocent wife/gf role on screen when i think about her real life personality despite of how her fans exaggerate how good/amazing her acting is, and to be honest, it doesnt impress me, and also if the fans are blind enough to ignore her affair and believe she is a person of integrity then i guess i shouldnt have been surprised about how they blindly believe she has good acting skills. what a joke.
i will still watch this lakorn for james but i think i will fastforward every alone scene for kim.
because VOMIT.
Broke rule #7: instigating problem with this statement, you implied that her fans are BLIND and love her talentless acting to even consider them as a joke.
LOL at all those disagree and dislike signs without a substantial comeback, makes me even question her fans' integrity in real life.
maybe those ppl are the reason why there are relationship problems caused by a 3rd person in society because basically you dont think it is morally wrong and if you dont stand against evil then you are consenting evil.
In this case it is adultery.
dont you have better celebrity role models to follow? SADSADSAD
Broke rule #3 & 7: Personal attack is not welcome. Telling the fans that they are consenting evil because they like their celebrity and that it's sad to see them not supporting/liking a better role model. People have different role model; your favorite is not a saint and so are theirs. Therefore, it's best that you leave their alone after you made it clear that you don't like them from your first post.
false accusation. hope you understand free speech and after all there wasnt personal insults for you or inappropiate words. if you just report someone because he/she holds different opinion then you are real immature.
Broke rule #3: Calling other people immature when they are only telling you to be considerate/conscious of others. Yet, you continue to make more trouble with rude comment tying their favorite celebrity's lifestyle to their personal lifestyle. This was uncalled for.
These folks who regard themselves as kim fans basically just want the truth sealed and unrevealed to general public, hence why not a civilised discussion, but reports the comments of truth so that it will be invisible?
be ware, ppl.
Most of the Kim fans are aware of her situation and have tried to move on from there. We can only have a civilize discussion when integrity is not drag out of proportion. By making assumption and labeling the fans and their integrity as part of society's problem will not make thing any less upsetting. Everyone in their right mind know how to distinguish between these two; celebrity life and reality world.
wow, thats weak. way to play some victim when the remark is pretty fair.
if the fans can tolerate kim being adulterous i think this remark is no big deal
It's not a fair remark when you labelled/called others' consideration as being rude and weak.
thats some double standard right there you joke. you calim you understand "you can say your opinion and i have my opinion" then whats with the "i hate what you said so i am gonna cry and tell my mama" ??? LMAO
You can say what you want as long as it does not bring harm to other by not making comment such as those things that you've said/labelled the fans to be. You are not in the fans' shoe and will not understand what they've been through -- you never know they might have fought this battle themselves and decided to forgive and forget to move on to embrace the growing/changing Kim in better ways.
i dont see why i am not being resonable? i stated my point fairly, if someone doesnt like it, i welcome civilised discussion other than her yelling "shut up it is offensive i dont wanna listen", doesnt that sound unreasonable to you?
Again, I'm going in circle. You have no business to call/blame the fans as part of society's problem.
LOL you are not going to? because you couldnt.
maybe the only thing you are capable of doing is when you dont like ppl's opinion you threaten to put a ban on it.
It's not that I couldn't ... it's because I'm repeating what Tina said and since you asked for it I sure hope you read what I wrote up there to make sense of the same repeated words made earlier by her. There are lots of repeating on top if you have not notice yet. If I want to ban you I wouldn't have given you 3 chances or bother to communicate with you here. I'm not one who abuse her power. I understand the statement, "with great power comes great responsibility." Banning you is pretty easy. I just have to create three strikes and then you're gone.
Word of advice, I don't threaten people without ground. Please go read the 9 rules we have in here to avoid such confrontation again and see that I'm just doing my duty as a moderator per the rules here (if you're curious, I co-wrote those rules so I know that you did not read it yet). It is also why the two of us moderators have to step in to correct this problem because rules can be forgotten simply due to how easy/lay back we are with members.
