first of rukmo she/he can differentiate between reality and acting that wasn't the point of the article, in case u miss it the main point of the article was to have media stop using lines in drama that justify rape, and that he/she felt that it was wrong that those type of lakorn are the highest rating in the country and how that is like saying that the country is condoning rape(im not sayign that he is sayign that but that he saying its liek that). so in other word this article has nothing to do with difference between rape in lakorn and rape in reality but more with the fact that rape isn't something that should be use often in lakorn as a way to bring up ratings.We all know that Rape is wrong, I guess that there are people out there who can't identify the difference between acting and reality.
i totally agree with the writer of the article
and iluvjin i think its alot worse than killing a person in certain aspect its funny how in lakorn they don't show the traumatic experience the victim goes through which is what 80%(made up percentage not real sure how much it is really but i know its a high percentage) of real rape victim goes through.